News Release Archive - Resources: Trade, World Bank, IMF

Beyond Obama’s Speech: A “U.S.-Saudi Axis” Backing Counter-Revolution

JOSEPH MASSAD, jam25 at columbia.edu
Massad is associate professor of modern Arab politics and intellectual history at Columbia University. He said today that Obama’s “silence on demonstrations in monarchies (Saudi Arabia, Oman, Jordan, Morocco) and the mild criticisms of Yemen stood in stark contrast with the vehemence of his criticisms of Syria and Libya. The belated mention of Bahrain stood out as a sign of a lack of courage, as now weeks after the Bahraini revolution has been crushed through use of a U.S.-supplied and supported Gulf mercenary force, Obama mustered the courage to speak about ongoing arrests there. In the case of Syria, the criticisms started from day one.”

Massad recently wrote the piece: “The future of the Arab uprisings: The U.S., with its allies, has already begun plans to subvert the Arab Spring to save its own regional hegemony,” which states: “The situation in Arab countries today is characterized as much by the counter-revolution sponsored by the Saudi regime and the United States as it is by the uprisings of the Arab peoples against U.S.-sponsored dictatorial regimes.

“While the U.S.-Saudi axis was caught unprepared for the Tunisian and Egyptian uprisings, they quickly made contingency plans to counter the uprisings elsewhere, especially in Bahrain and Oman, but also in Jordan and Yemen, as well as take control of the uprisings in Libya (at first) and later in Syria. Attempts to take control of the Yemeni uprising have had mixed results so far.”

NICK TURSE, nat9 at columbia.edu
Turse is a fellow at Harvard University’s Radcliffe Institute and author of The Case for Withdrawal from Afghanistan. He recently wrote the piece “Obama’s Reset: Arab Spring or Same Old Thing? How the President and the Pentagon Prop Up Both Middle Eastern Despots and American Arms Dealers,” which states: “For months now, the world has watched as protesters have taken to the streets across the Middle East to demand a greater say in their lives. In Tunisia and Egypt, they toppled decades-old dictatorships. In Bahrain and Yemen, they were shot down in the streets as they demanded democracy. In the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, they called for reforms, free speech, and basic rights, and ended up bloodied and often in jail cells. In Iraq, they protested a lack of food and jobs, and in response got bullets and beatings.

“As the world watched, trained eyes couldn’t help noticing something startling about the tools of repression in those countries. The armored personnel carriers, tanks, and helicopters used to intimidate or even kill peaceful protesters were often American models.

“For decades, the U.S. has provided military aid, facilitated the sale of weaponry, and transferred vast quantities of arms to a host of Middle Eastern despots. Arming Arab autocrats, however, isn’t only the work of presidents past. A TomDispatch analysis of Pentagon documents finds that the Obama administration has sought to send billions of dollars in weapons systems — from advanced helicopters to fighter jets — to the very regimes that have beaten, jailed, and killed pro-democracy demonstrators, journalists, and reform activists throughout the Arab Spring.”

Turse is associate editor of TomDispatch.com, one of the webpages blocked to State Department employees. In his speech at the State Department today Obama lauded internet freedom: wemeantwell.com.

Reuters report: “U.S. announces $60 billion arms sale for Saudi Arabia

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

Immigration: “U.S. Drug Demand Destabilizes Mexico”

JOHN GIBLER, john.gibler at gmail.com
Author of the forthcoming book To Die in Mexico: Dispatches from Inside the Drug War as well as Mexico Unconquered: Chronicles of Power and Revolt, Gibler said today: “Immigration from Mexico to the U.S. is largely the result of failed policies by the U.S. and Mexican governments. These include trade policies that have resulted in a lack of economic opportunities in Mexico and drug policies that have led to a recent explosion of violence in Mexico. Rather than focusing exclusively on the symptoms with immigration reform, as Obama appears to be doing, he should start by dealing with drug policy reform, so that drug demand in the U.S. stops destabilizing Mexico.”

Gibler just wrote the piece “A War of Anonymous Death,” which states: “After four years of President Felipe Calderón’s so-called war on Mexico’s drug trafficking organizations, murder and impunity have become the order of the day. Since December 2006, more than 38,000 people have been killed, with no noticeable reduction in drug shipments across the border. Federal authorities have opened investigations into less than five percent of those homicides. Most of the people killed are assumed to be guilty of their own murders by the implied logic that surely they were up to no good if they ended up in a ditch, wrapped in a blanket, and shot through the head.”

Background: BBC reports: “More than 20,000 people have gathered in the centre of Mexico City to protest about the large number of deaths caused by drug-related violence and the government’s response to it.”

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

“Major Corporations Are Threatening Us”

RICHARD WOLFF, [in NYC] rdwolff at att.net, rdwolff.com
Wolff just wrote the piece “The Threats of Business and the Business of Threats,” which states: “More and more we hear that nothing can be done to tax major corporations because of the threat of how they would respond. Likewise, we cannot stop their price gouging or even the government subsidies and tax loopholes they enjoy. For example, as the oil majors reap stunning profits from high oil and gas prices, we are told it is impossible to tax their windfall profits or stop the billions they get in government subsidies and tax loopholes. There appears to be no way for the government to secure lower energy prices or seriously impose and enforce environmental protection laws. Likewise, despite high and fast rising drug and medicine prices, we are told that it is impossible to raise taxes on pharmaceutical companies or have the government secure lower pharmaceutical prices. And so on.

“Such steps by ‘our’ government are said to be impossible or inadvisable. The reason: corporations would then relocate production abroad or reduce their activities in the U.S. or both. And that would deprive the U.S. of taxes and jobs. In plain English, MAJOR CORPORATIONS ARE THREATENING US. We are to knuckle under and cut social programs that benefit millions of people (college loan programs, Medicaid, Medicare, social security, nutrition programs, and so on). We are not to demand higher taxes or lower subsidies or fewer tax loopholes for corporations. We are not to demand government action to lower their soaring prices. And if we do, corporations will punish us. …” http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2011/wolff100511.html

Wolff is author of the book Capitalism Hits the Fan: The Global Economic Meltdown and What to Do About It. He is professor of economics emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst and currently a visiting professor in the Graduate Program for International Affairs at the New School University in New York City. Video of his talk “Capitalism Hits the Fan” is available at: capitalismhitsthefan.com.

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

Repression in Honduras “Worse than After Coup”

Committee of Families of the Detained and Disappeared in Honduras reports a dramatic increase in the ongoing violent repression of human rights in Honduras. This includes government attacks against protests at a “Honduras is Open for Business” conference this weekend, which attracted Carlos Slim, the richest man in Mexico, among others.

DANA FRANK, dlfrank at ucsc.edu
Frank is a professor of history at the University of California at Santa Cruz specializing in Honduras. She recently wrote a piece for the Nation titled “Open Season on Teachers in Honduras,” which states: “In Honduras, it’s come to this: when 90 percent of the city’s 68,000 public schoolteachers went out on strike in March to protest the privatization of the entire public school system, the government tear-gassed their demonstrations for almost three solid weeks, then suspended 305 teachers for two to six months as punishment for demonstrating, and then, when negotiations broke down, threatened to suspend another 5,000 public schoolteachers. The level of repression in Honduras, after a nationwide wave of attacks on the opposition in March and early April, now exceeds that of the weeks immediately following the June 28, 2009 military coup that deposed President Manuel Zelaya, as current President Porfirio ‘Pepe’ Lobo Sosa wages war on entire swaths of the Honduran population.”

Frank’s books include Bananeras: Women Transforming the Banana Unions of Latin America.

See a pair of recent reports from The Real News by Jesse Freeston:

Special Report: Honduran Teachers Get Shock Treatment: Post-coup regime in Honduras carrying out unprecedented assault on the most organized sector of the resistance, the teachers

Report from Land Occupations in Post-Coup Honduras: Poor farmers are taking land from agribusiness that supported the 2009 military coup — and paying with their lives

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

EPA Office of Civil Rights “Dysfunctional”

Politico reported Monday: “A whistleblower group is calling on the EPA to fire its civil rights director in response to allegedly sexist and racist remarks he’s made involving ‘pink elephants’ and Rosa Parks.

“The National Whistleblowers Center sent a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson on Wednesday demanding the immediate dismissal of Rafael DeLeon, director of the agency’s Office of Civil Rights. …

“EPA spokesman Brendan Gilfillan said Thursday that the agency will look into the allegations,and that Jackson is ‘deeply committed to issues of environmental justice, civil rights and a healthy workplace for all.’”

MARSHA COLEMAN-ADEBAYO, nofearcoalition at aol.com
RICHARD RENNER, rr at whistleblowers.org
Coleman-Adebayo was one of the subjects of the disparaging remarks. She has been described by Time Magazine as “a former EPA employee whose complaints of a ‘racially toxic’ environment there led to the signing of the Notification and Federal Employee Anti-Discrimination and Retaliation Act of 2001.” She is currently working on a book No Fear: A Whistleblower’s Triumph Over Corruption and Retaliation at the EPA.

Renner is legal director of the National Whistleblowers Center. He said today: “Dr. Coleman-Adebayo is an environmental whistleblower who raised concerns about the dangers of vanadium mining in South Africa. When her concerns focused on the role of U.S. companies in apartheid South Africa she became the victim of a hostile work environment. Ms. [Susan] Morris [another woman apparently disparaged by Mr. DeLeon] raised concerns about EPA’s compliance with the Civil Rights Act and then suffered a removal from her supervisory position.”

The National Whistleblowers Center recently wrote to EPA head Jackson: “The Office of Civil Rights under your administration has failed. As its name suggests, OCR should be at the forefront of eliminating discrimination and advancing civil rights and liberties within the Agency. Instead of taking positive actions to correct the endemic problems, your newly appointed director, Rafael DeLeon, has exemplified a continuation of the old mode of denying that any problems exist and defending management. The recent Deloitte Consultant Report on the civil rights program described OCR as essentially dysfunctional. Yet, the very man placed in the office to ‘fix it,’ is someone that numerous women have filed complaints against. During a recent MSPB hearing, under oath, Mr. DeLeon stated that he could not ‘remember’ how many complaints had been filed against him. …

“It has come to our attention that during a recent Agency-wide conference call, Mr. DeLeon bragged about actions taken against two senior female civil rights leaders, calling them ‘pink elephants.’ As you are no doubt aware, the term ‘pink elephant’ was popularized during the last presidential election. The pink elephant refers … disrespectfully to women who are characterized as pitbulls with lipstick.”

The NWC also stated: “A recent Deloitte Consultant report found that the EPA’s Office of Civil Rights was essentially dysfunctional. … Mr. DeLeon fired former EPA employee and NWC Board of Director’s Member Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo.”

The Deloitte Consultant report: “Evaluation of the EPA Office of Civil Rights” PDF

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

Escalating Iraq Protests: U.S. “Playing with Fire”

AFP is reporting today: “Moqtada al-Sadr on Wednesday blasted a ban on public rallies in the Iraqi capital, saying it was ‘undemocratic’ and based on fear of rising protests.

“Iraq’s government announced last week demonstrations would be allowed only at three football stadiums, ostensibly because shopkeepers in the city’s main Tahrir Square complained of losing trade during weekly protests.”

MICHELE NAAR-OBED, cptiraq — at — cpt.org
Michele Naar-Obed is in the northern Iraqi city of Suleimaniya and recently wrote a piece titled “The Least Reported Unarmed Revolution in the Middle East.”

She wrote yesterday: “Following 62 days of continuous protest in Suleimaniya against corruption and tribal rule within the Kurdistan Regional Government, legal permission for the protest has been revoked and a source within the armed Peshmerga forces [Kurdish militias] said the forces were given orders to shoot to kill any demonstrators today….”

Today, she told IPA: “We are living in a military siege. Ten thousand troops are here occupying the city. … Arrests are ongoing. People are being beaten, gassed, and shot at. Now the troops have official permission to shoot in the legs. Yesterday, we heard that they could shoot to kill. This is for anyone that even remotely tries to form a demonstration anywhere. Last night there were official meetings with the U.S., PUK [Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, has been headed by Jalal Talabani, who is president of Iraq] and [an] opposition party.”

Michele Naar-Obed works with the Christian Peacemaker Teams, a human rights organization and has been based in Suleimaniya since 2006.

RAED JARRAR, jarrar.raed — at — gmail.com
An Iraqi-American blogger and political analyst based in Washington, D.C., Jarrar recently wrote the piece “Playing with Fire in Iraq.”

He said today: “Although Iraqis have been demonstrating in the streets since late February, most of the demands were focused on improving services and fighting corruption. Protests have been intensifying since U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates visited Baghdad earlier this month in what was seen as an attempt to extend the December 31 deadline that requires all the U.S. armed forces to leave Iraq. The deadline was agreed upon in the binding bilateral Security Agreement, and it requires both combat and non-combat forces affiliated with the DoD to leave the country before the end of this year bringing down the number of U.S. armed forces to zero.

“Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis took to the streets on April 9, which marks the day of the fall of Baghdad under the U.S.-led military occupation, demanding a complete U.S. withdrawal before the end of the year. Tens of thousands of have been staging a sit-in protest in Mosul since, and some Iraqi soldiers and police are joining the protesters in the last few days.

“Considering the recent wave of protests in Iraq and the region, the U.S. government is playing with fire in Iraq. Any attempts to delay or cancel the United States’ complete departure will most likely spark a nationwide revolt against the very unpopular U.S. military presence there.”

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

Breaking: Arab Democracy Protests in D.C.

Several hundred people are now protesting at the Saudi Embassy in Washington, D.C. and plan to march to the White House. Organizers expect between one and two thousand people to take part today. The rallies protest the Bahrain regime’s crackdown against the pro-democracy movement there as well as Saudi and U.S. government backing of the regime in Bahrain. Saudi troops moved into Bahrain at the request of the regime on March 14 (just days after the earthquake in Japan). For more information on rallies, see: bahrainrallydc.wordpress.com and #bahrainrally.

Among the groups participating:

HUSAIN ABDULLA
Abdulla is director of Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain. He said today: “The European parliament has been condemning the violent repression of peaceful protesters in Bahrain to no avail while the U.S. government has been silent. Then, yesterday, the U.S. finally said something about the Bahrain regime eliminating opposition parties and the regime immediately backed off. This shows the U.S. government has real influence. Unfortunately, instead of getting the regime to stop its violence, it has backed it.”

MOHAMMAD ALI NAQUVI
Naquvi is with the American Council for Freedom in Bahrain, which said in a statement: “[We] demand an end to the intimidation, torture and killing of peaceful protesters, human rights activists and health and medical personnel in Bahrain at the hands of the Bahraini military and security forces provided by Saudi Arabia and other states. Political institutions have been trying to stoke the fire of Shia-Sunni sectarianism instead of resolving the real issues — the barbaric actions and unfair political and economic policies of the ruling family in Bahrain [and] a state of forceful repression. …

“The U.S. has an obligation to immediately suspend the transfer of weapons, munitions and related equipment to Bahrain that could be used to commit further human rights violations, and to urgently review all arms supplies and training support to Bahrain’s military, security and police forces. American interests will only be enhanced if we work to increase stability in the region by furthering human rights without discrimination.”

Background: “CNN arrests expose crackdown in Bahrain

Bahrain questions three journalists after crackdown

U.S. Keeps Quiet over Repression

Zainab Alkhawaja’s (who is on a hunger strike following the beating and detention of her father, a human rights activist) letter to President Obama: angryarabiya.blogspot.com

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

Japan Disaster to Level Seven: “The Explosion of Nukespeak”

The Japanese government has raised the emergency at the Fukushima nuclear plant to level seven, from a level five. This puts it at the highest level, as was Chernobyl.

KARL GROSSMAN
Grossman and others have been advocating raising the emergency level as a first step for weeks. Professor of journalism at the State University of New York/College at Old Westbury, Grossman is author of Cover Up: What You Are Not Supposed to Know About Nuclear Power and Power Crazy.

He said today: “Finally, the Japanese government is acknowledging a little reality. But the sad fact is that the Fukushima disaster is beyond a level seven disaster, it’s off the books. You have multiple reactors and cooling pools.

Grossman just wrote the piece “Fukushima Nuclear Disaster at One Month: The Explosion of Nukespeak,’” which states: “The classic book on disinformation on nuclear technology is Nukespeak, published in 1982. It is dedicated to George Orwell, author of 1984, and written by Stephen Hilgarten, Richard C. Bell and Rory O’Connor.

“It opens by declaring that ‘the history of nuclear development has been profoundly shaped by the manipulation through official secrecy and extensive public-relations campaigns. Nukespeak and the use of information-management techniques have consistently distorted the debate over nuclear weapons and nuclear power. Time and time again, nuclear developers have confused their hopes with reality, publicly presented their expectations and assumptions as facts, covered up damaging information, harassed and fired scientists who disagreed with established policy, refused to recognize the existence of problems … claimed that there was no choice but to follow their policies.’”

See: IPA news release “Chernobyl Experts: Fukushima Could be Worse” from March 23.

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

“Exposed: The U.S.-Saudi Libya Deal”

PEPE ESCOBAR, [in Brazil] Skype: pepeasia
Escobar just wrote the piece “Exposed: The U.S.-Saudi Libya Deal,” which states: “You invade Bahrain. We take out Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. This, in short, is the essence of a deal struck between the Barack Obama administration and the House of Saud. Two diplomatic sources at the United Nations independently confirmed that Washington, via Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, gave the go-ahead for Saudi Arabia to invade Bahrain and crush the pro-democracy movement of their neighbor in exchange for a ‘yes’ vote by the Arab League for a no-fly zone over Libya — the main rationale that led to United Nations Security Council resolution 1973. …

“A full Arab League endorsement of a no-fly zone is a myth. Of the 22 full members, only 11 were present at the voting. Six of them were GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council] members, the U.S.-supported club of Gulf kingdoms/sheikhdoms, of which Saudi Arabia is the top dog. Syria and Algeria were against it. Saudi Arabia only had to ‘seduce’ three other members to get the vote.

“Translation: only nine out of 22 members of the Arab League voted for the no-fly zone. The vote was essentially a House of Saud-led operation, with Arab League secretary general Amr Moussa keen to polish his CV with Washington with an eye to becoming the next Egyptian President.

“Thus, in the beginning, there was the great 2011 Arab revolt. Then, inexorably, came the U.S.-Saudi counter-revolution.” [Brazil is one of a few non-Arab countries granted observer status at the Arab League.] Escobar’s books include “Obama Does Globalistan.” His recent writings for the Asia Times are at: http://atimes.com/atimes/others/Pepe2011.html .

The AP is reporting this morning: “Bahrain Wages Unrelenting Crackdown on Shiites.”

Also available to assess these developments and revelations:

HUSAIN ABDULLA
Abdulla is director of Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain. He said today: “Despite the total regime crackdown, Saudi invasion, lack of attention or outside support, the protests in Bahrain are continuing.”

VIJAY PRASHAD, @vijayprashad
Author of The Darker Nations: A People’s History of the Third World, Prashad is the George and Martha Kellner Chair of South Asian History and director of International Studies at Trinity College, Hartford, Conn. He recently wrote the piece “Intervening in Libya.”

SAM HUSSEINI, @samhuseini
Communications director for the Institute for Public Accuracy, Husseini recently wrote the piece “U.S. Not Guilty of Double Standards.”

Background:

The British Telegraph reported this week: “Saudi officials say they gave their backing to Western air strikes on Libya in exchange for the United States muting its criticism of the authorities in Bahrain, a close ally of the desert kingdom.”

Former British ambassador Craig Murray wrote on March 14: “A senior diplomat in a western mission to the UN in New York, who I have known over ten years and trust, has told me for sure that Hillary Clinton agreed to the cross-border use of troops to crush democracy in the Gulf, as a quid pro quo for the Arab League calling for Western intervention in Libya.”

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

As Japan Disaster Spreads, Threatening U.S., Obama Embraces Nuclear Power

ARJUN MAKHIJANI
Available for a limited number of interviews, Makhijani is president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, which has released a series of papers on the Japan nuclear disaster. The most recent is titled “Radioactive Iodine Releases from Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi Reactors May Exceed Those of Three Mile Island by Over 100,000 Times.”

AILEEN MIOKO SMITH
Aileen Mioko Smith is executive director of Green Action, a Japanese environmental group. She happens to be visiting California, where she is scheduled to be until April 12.  She has been stating from the beginning of the crisis that the Japanese government has not been sharing critical information with the public. She is analyzing the situation and has been translating reports and posting other information at: fukushima.greenaction-japan.org.

She said today: “We would like to have the international community sanction the Japanese government for wantonly raising the level of contamination allowed for Fukashima citizens. Up until now, it had certain standards for food from the area, but is working to change those standards to make things appear OK. What the government should be doing is broadening the official evacuation zone.”

HARVEY WASSERMAN
Wasserman is author of Solartopia! Our Green-Powered Earth, AD 2030 (which includes an introduction by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.). Wasserman recently wrote the piece “‘Safe’ Radiation is a Lethal TMI Lie.” He is posting regularly at: nukefree.org/news/Nuke.

KARL GROSSMAN
Professor of journalism at the State University of New York/College at Old Westbury, Grossman is author of Cover Up: What You Are Not Supposed to Know About Nuclear Power and Power Crazy. He just wrote the piece “Obama’s Wrongheaded Nuclear Stance — After Japan Disaster,” which states: “President Barack Obama’s support this week for the construction of more nuclear power plants in the United States, amid the ongoing nuclear power plant disaster in Japan, must be considered as among the most wrongheaded and irrational positions ever taken by a U.S. president, against stiff competition.

“As a candidate for president, Obama knew about the deadly dangers of nuclear power. ‘I start off with the premise that nuclear energy is not optimal and so I am not a nuclear energy proponent,’ Obama said at a campaign stop in Newton, Iowa on December 30, 2007. ‘My general view is that until we can make certain that nuclear power plants are safe … I don’t think that’s the best option. I am much more interested in solar and wind and bio-diesel and strategies [for] alternative fuels.’”

Grossman added: “The claim being disseminated by media of ‘no immediate danger’ from the spread now worldwide of radioactivity from the ongoing nuclear power disaster in Japan is outrageous. Any amount of radioactivity can kill, as has now been widely acknowledged by organizations involved in research on radiation. The media coverage overall of the catastrophe has been barely passable to dreadful. It’s been full of journalistic ignorance (the repeated reports, for example, that potassium iodide pills will ‘block radioactivity’ when, in fact, they block only radioactive iodine, one of hundreds of radioactive poisons) and the presentation of nuclear promoters as ‘experts’ (making declarations such as one ‘expert’ on PBS NewsHour saying the plutonium discharges in Japan are ‘actually typical of natural plutonium contamination in this country.’ There’s no ‘natural plutonium contamination’ in the U.S. — plutonium is man-made. Journalists desperately need to know the facts about nuclear technology — and not be bamboozled, as is the current media situation.”

Background: From the New Scientist: “Fukushima radioactive fallout nears Chernobyl levels,” which states: “Japan’s damaged nuclear plant in Fukushima has been emitting radioactive iodine and caesium at levels approaching those seen in the aftermath of the Chernobyl accident in 1986. Austrian researchers have used a worldwide network of radiation detectors — designed to spot clandestine nuclear bomb tests — to show that iodine-131 is being released at daily levels 73 per cent of those seen after the 1986 disaster. The daily amount of caesium-137 released from Fukushima Daiichi is around 60 per cent of the amount released from Chernobyl.”

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167