Latest News Release – Interviews Available
Obama on Guantanamo and Drone Killing
President Obama is scheduled to speak at the National Defense University today at 2 p.m. on his drone killing policies and holding individuals at Guantanamo, about 100 of whom are reportedly currently on a hunger strike. The New York Times reports: “the administration on Wednesday formally acknowledged for the first time that it had killed four American citizens in drone strikes outside the battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq, arguing that its actions were justified by the danger to the United States.”
CARLOS WARNER, carloswarnerlaw at gmail.com, @Carlos_Warner
Warner is an attorney with the Federal Public Defender of the Northern District of Ohio. He represents 11 Guantanamo prisoners. He said today: “Lifting the Executive Order restricting transfers to Yemen is a good start. More importantly, if the President is serious about closing the prison, he must appoint someone with power within the White House. If the President only pledges to reopen an office in the State Department and start the Periodic Review Boards, he is not serious about closing Guantanamo.”
BRUCE FEIN, bruce at thelichfieldgroup.com
Fein was deputy attorney general under President Ronald Reagan and is author of Constitutional Peril: The Life and Death Struggle for Our Constitution and Democracy. He said today regarding reports that execution of drone strikes will shift in many cases from the CIA to the Pentagon: “This would be a step backward on transparency, would mean even less congressional oversight. Will not be reported as covert actions to House and Senate Intelligence Committees. CIA must report anticipated covert actions to Intelligence Committees under Title 50. Title 10 for military has no such thing.”
Regarding reports that the administration would end so-called “signature strikes” — which can be based on traits such as males of a certain age range, Fein stated: “It insinuates signature strikes have been illegal homicides.”
Fein stated: “The Constitution’s makers deplored the combination of legislative, executive, and judicial powers in a single branch as the very definition of tyranny. President Obama thus shoulders a heavy burden in seeking to explain how his playing prosecutor, judge, jury and executioner to kill any citizen or non-citizen anywhere on the planet justified by his secret say-so alone, unaccountable to federal courts or congressional oversight, satisfies constitutional due process and the separation of powers. The Soviet Union’s Joseph Stalin never claimed greater unchecked authority in liquidating the kulaks and exterminating all his perceived enemies.”
Fein recently write the piece “Learning From Shakespeare” and recently wrote a letter with Ralph Nader to Obama: “In light of your obligation to explain ‘by what authority,’ we were dismayed that you refused to send a witness to testify on April 23, 2013, regarding the legality of your predator drone targeted and signature killing programs before Senator Richard Durbin’s Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution. That disdain for the rule of law and congressional oversight contrasts unfavorably with President Gerald Ford’s willingness to testify personally before a House Judiciary Subcommittee on his pardon of former President Richard Nixon.”
NOOR MIR, noor at codepink.org, @thedronalisa
ROOJ ALWAZIR, Rooj129 at gmail.com, @WomanfromYemen
MEDEA BENJAMIN, medea at codepink.org
ALLI McCRACKEN, alli at codepink.org
McCracken, Mir, Alwazir and Benjamin — who wrote the book Drone Warfare: Killing by Remote Control — are activists who will be holding a news conference outside Obama’s speech venue beginning at 11 a.m., organized by CodePink.
REBECCA GRIFFIN, via Reva Patwardhan, rpatwardhan at peaceactionwest.org
Griffin is political director for Peace Action West. She said today: “The administration has ramped up a dangerous tactic that could have far-reaching consequences. According to the New America Foundation, only 2 percent of those killed in drone strikes in Pakistan are militant leaders. While the administration claims that it focuses on terrorists that pose an imminent threat, the white paper leaked from the Justice Department shows a definition of imminence that goes far beyond people on the verge of carrying out attacks on the United States. The administration uses the nearly twelve-year-old Authorization for the Use of Military Force as part of its legal justification for drone strikes, going well beyond its original scope. Military officials claimed in a recent Senate hearing that it would authorize use of force almost anywhere in the world, prompting Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) to call it the ‘most astoundingly disturbing hearing’ he had been to in the Senate.
“The administration is risking blowback and killing innocent civilians without making a case that these targets pose a serious imminent threat to our security. Furthermore, this administration is setting a dangerous precedent for future presidents, as well as other countries, for the broad use of armed drones.”
Recent Blog Posts
Obama’s Economic Race Legacy
One has to believe in something or someone in order to betray it or them.
From the start, President Barack Obama has shown little interest or loyalty in the issues that affect the poor, working class and people of color in the United States. For almost his entire first term he didn’t utter the words poor or poverty. Early on he reminded African Americans: ‘I’m not the president of black America. I’m the president of the United States of America…’
So it’s not so surprising that Obama hasn’t done much of substance or impact to ease, let alone end, the depression in the black community. He’s been on the side of the banks and Wall Street since co-signing George Bush’s and Hank Paulsen’s TARP ‘too big to fail’ bank bailout at the expense of underwater homeowners and middle-class taxpayers. [more]
What We Should be Talking About: Romney’s Foreign Policy Advisers
John Kennedy used to say, “Domestic policy can hurt us; foreign policy can kill us.”
But despite the fact that lives (American, allied, and civilian) continue to be lost in Afghanistan and Iraq, and Israel is blustering about attacking Iran before the US election (in order to drag in a reluctant Obama administration), much more time will be given to domestic policy rantings then foreign policy. In the 2000 election, there was very little debate about foreign policy, though anyone who looked closely might have guessed that Bush’s foreign policy advisors (who called themselves “the vulcans,” and had complex and long-standing links to groups and think tanks pressing for war on Iraq, would undertake that project at the slightest provocation.
This year, with less excuse (given the large deficit and two ongoing military operations), we have had very little discussion in the media about Romney’s foreign policy advisors. Yet, they are a far more coherent group of militarists than the Bush team.
Dying to Live in Mexico
Cuernavaca, Mexico — In 2011, some 12,000 people were murdered in situations presumably related to the drug trafficking industry in Mexico. In 2010, the number was more than 15,000 killed. Between December 2006, when Felipe Calderón of the conservative National Action Party (PAN) took office and declared a “war on drug traffickers” and January 2012, depending on the source, some 47,000 to 60,000 people have been slain, and some 5,000 disappeared. This grim fact has become the centerpiece of Mexican politics and an inescapable force in daily life throughout much of the country.
But neither the number of people killed nor the cruelty of the killings can be understood without simultaneously taking account of another pair of figures. First, Calderón has repeatedly said that more than 90 percent of those killed were involved in “the struggle of some cartels against others.” Calderón does not cite a source for this estimate. The underlying logic, however, is clear: if you’re dead, you’re guilty. The perennial official refrain is “en algo andaba,” or, they were up to something; they were in the game. [more]
THE PAYROLL TAX CUT: Talk about a Ponzi Scheme!
Is President Obama trying to kill Social Security without explicitly saying so? He put Social Security “on the table” for consideration by his Deficit Commission — even though Social Security has not contributed to creating or sustaining the deficit/debt in the first place. He kept Social Security on the table when he made a deal to delegate deficit reduction authority over entitlements to an undemocratic Super Committee. Now, in a speech reportedly about jobs, he proposed to extend and increase the ill-considered FICA tax cut he embraced last December — a tax cut that directly undermines the financial integrity of Social Security.
According to the White House Fact Sheet on “The American Jobs Act” the FICA tax holiday for workers will be increased to a 50% reduction, lowering it to 3.1%. Under the 2010 tax deal, the payroll tax for workers was reduced from 6.2% to 4.2%. In addition to expanding the tax cut for workers, the President proposes to extend the FICA tax holiday to employers by cutting in half the employer’s share of the payroll tax through the first $5 million in payroll. [more]
In The News
James Henry on NPR
IPA expert, former chief economist at McKinsey and lead researcher of the Tax Justice Network’s report, “The Price of Offshore Revisited” featured on NPR’s “The Diane Rehm Show” speaking on international tax havens.
Norman Solomon Debates Ex-Powell Aide Lawrence Wilkerson
Following his inclusion in the IPA news release “Colin Powell’s Infamous U.N. Speech, 10 Years Later: Deceiving Public, Ignoring Whistleblowers Led to War,” Norman Solomon was featured in a debate on Democracy Now!, “Decade After Iraq WMD Speech at UN, Ex-Powell Aide Lawrence Wilkerson Debates Author Norman Solomon.”
‘Two Anaheims’
After an IPA news release highlighting police brutality, economic inequalities, and lack of Latino representation in the Latino-majority city of Anaheim, Al Jazeera English’s ‘Faultline’ produced a 24 minute documentary, ‘Anaheim: A Tale of Two Cities.’
Ray McGovern in Al Jazeera English
Following his inclusion in the IPA news release, “After Petraeus,” Ray McGovern was featured in the Al Jazeera English article “Obama backs Allen as Petraeus inquiry widens.” He said, “If people see these folks as being unfaithful in small things, how can you expect them to tell the truth about progress in Afghanistan? You cannot expect them to do that. What we have here is a situation where the troops know that they cannot trust their superiors.”
Currently in New York City, Nairn is an investigative reporter who covered the recent trial in Guatemala and was slated to be a witness.
“If in fact he [President Obama] goes ahead and prosecutes Julian Assange [of WikiLeaks], he will pass Nixon [in attacking the First Amendment]. He’s close to Nixon now. The AP example is a good example of something that Obama has done but Nixon never did.”